Click on a word cloud below to find out more about the session ... and remember you can use the search box to the right to find sessions within any track by author, area of interest, etc. Based on space and design considerations, the editors made decisions with regard to author listings on the Table of Content pages. If there are one or two authors for the session, all names are listed. If there are three or more authors for the session, the first author and et al. are listed. On individual session pages names, affiliations, and contact information is provided for every author in the session. We are sorry for having to limit the number of author names on the Table of Contents pages.
Please give us feedback about the Proceeding. Complete this short survey.
Connecting partners: Engagement boundary-spanning roles for community partners (Adams & Sandmann)
Community partner perspectives on the ability of partnerships to advance social change goals (Alcantara et al.)
Understanding community partners’ motivations to participate in academic outreach (Barrera)
Learning partnerships with Aboriginal communities: The benefits and challenges of indigenous community‐based education (Brown & Pritchard)
Meeting diverse clients’ needs in academic service‐learning: Motivation for collaboration (Darby et al.)
Motivation to collaborate: Community organizations and universities working together (Darby et al.)
Community agency needs assessment for improved reciprocity (Denton)
Dynamics of success in three‐way P‐16 service learning partnerships (Dierberger et al.)
Relational dialectics as a framework for community‐campus partners to collaborate despite differences (Dumlao & Janke)
An environment of service and volunteerism: The impact of the Purposeful Living Units Serve (PLUS) program on prisoners’ self‐esteem and civic development (Frank)
CEG study in corrections: A collaboration between three community agencies (Green et al.)
Capacity development: Research rooted in community partner voice (Green & Proffitt)
Community voices: The value of service‐learning (Hartman)
Framing a theory-grounded research agenda related to partnerships (Hatcher et al.)
Connecting the dots: Partnering with community to build community based participatory research skills among graduate students (Hines-Martin & Bowland)
Components of a comprehensive university-community civic engagement assessment strategy (Kauffmann & Pickron-Davis)
Engaging the “forgotten half”: Civic engagement among youth not on campuses (Kiesa)
Cultivating connections: A partnership between Loyola University Maryland and Baltimore Reads (Leary et al.)
Solving complex social problems from the ground up: A factor model of community motivation to participate in engaged scholarship (Norvell & Lund‐Chaix)
Advocacy: Its impact in the classroom and the community (Puglisi)
The challenge of academic-community partnerships: Analyzing divergent perspectives (Ruiz)
“We butted heads so nicely”: Considering ‘grassroots think-tanks’ and science shops to generate new knowledge by connecting ‘local’ and ‘expert’ knowers in community-campus partnerships (Sandy)
Bringing the global local: Engaging community partners in academic service learning (Stanlick & Gisolo)
Understanding the intersections of reciprocity and organizational capacity (Winemiller-Basinger & Hunter)
Outputs to outcomes: A preliminary assessment of community impact through community voice (Wolff et al.)
Community partnership switchboard: Researching how and when to connect (Wood-Turner)
Tri-model collaboration: Headache or sustainability factor (Yack-Hall)
Based on space and design considerations, the editors made decisions with regard to author listings on the Table of Content pages. If there are one or two authors for the session, all names are listed. If there are three or more authors for the session, the first author and et al. are listed. On individual session pages names, affiliations, and contact information is provided for every author in the session. We are sorry for having to limit the number of author names on the Table of Contents pages.
Please give us feedback about the Proceeding. Complete this short survey.
Return to Top